This story began as a conversation in my family–how do we get groceries or order food while trying to shelter at home during the pandemic? Some argue that going to the supermarket is needlessly risky. Others are reluctant to ask others, who are less well off, to assume those risks.
We’re having similar debates, as you may be, about whether to order take-out from restaurants or patronize a favorite coffee shop. What, if anything, do we owe to these places that have been there for us for years?
I had hoped to talk to some gig-economy workers for this story but they were too busy. (Surprise!) So I talked to ethicists, and read what I could about the working conditions and pay at Instacart, the giant in the Internet home delivery business. Here’s how my story, which appears at Medium, begins:
“When the plague came to London in 1665, Londoners lost their wits,” the historian Jill Lepore writes in The New Yorker. “Everyone behaved badly, though the rich behaved the worst: Having failed to heed warnings to provision, they sent their poor servants out for supplies.”
Today, only the richest of the rich have poor servants to do their shopping. The rest of us rely on Instacart, Door Dash and Uber Eats.
This raises a thorny question: Is it ethical, during the pandemic, for healthy people to hire others to bring them food and take risks they want to avoid? The Silicon Valley gig-economy firms do not provide workers with health insurance or hazard pay, and they need not pay even the minimum wage.
“Those of us who are lucky enough to have jobs that enable us to work from home need to be honest with ourselves about whether we are bearing our fair share of the collective risk, or whether our comfort is coming at too high a price to others,” says Karen Stohr, a senior scholar at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown University. “If we’re healthy, this may mean going to the grocery store ourselves rather than relying on others to do it for us.”
You can read the rest here.